A couple of weeks ago, I got very high and had a potentially important series of thoughts. I was considering water tension, gravity, and the gas-liquid state conversion, and realized it was all governed by the same laws of particle physics on the molecular level. Then I made connections that all Newtonian motion are governed by these same rules, and that very likely, Newtonian motion can be broken down into the movement of electrons. Every time you zoom in, you find a level of detail at which everything fits into the same category: everything is made of molecules, all molecules are made of atoms... These levels of detail and abstraction are an invention of consciousness and the limitations of our biological sensors, because we don't have the bandwidth to process reality in constant infinite detail.
And then, what happens if you keep zooming out? You lose that detail. The smaller parts stop looking unique and individual, and instead their manifestations are only seen as part of a broader pattern. Everything is patterns, all the way up.
The specifics of the science aren't important for this post, and I probably was wrong about some of them.
The most important realizations were:
- Thinking in such detail about molecular-level physics is a very Bash thing to do.
- Thinking about the deep interconnectedness of the universe is a very Wizard thing to do. (And a stereotype of being high, sure.)
- This did not feel like a state of co-consciousness or conversation. It felt like an altered state of a single element of my system.
- Bash and Wizard may in fact be the same entity.
I am now trying to investigate these concepts. There is pushback internally to the idea that Bash and Wizard may be the same, but there was also pushback internally to the idea that we were plural at all. We have previously differentiated Wizard on the basis that it has conflicting ideas with other members of the system, as well as elements in common with both Bash and Paul.
If Wizard is the same entity as both Bash and Paul...? That seems drastic, but it might be possible. It would mean that conglomerate spends about the same amount of time at/near front as Fox and Merlin each do.
At what point have we zoomed out too far and lost the useful distinctions in search of a broader pattern? What parts of this are actionable, and what parts are useful to act on?